Citizen Hussein

In his beautifully titled post from June this year, Civis Americanus Sum, Daniel May criticized the Obama Administration's inaction towards the plight of the two American journalists imprisoned by North Korea after a sham conviction. He wrote:

In 1848, a mob ransacked the home of Don Pacifico, a British citizen living in Greece. Local police did not intervene to stop the mob, and the Greek government refused to compensate Pacifico for damage to his property after the attack. Though Pacifico had never even set foot in the British Isles (he was born in Gibraltar), Foreign Secretary Lord Palmerston sent a squadron of the Royal Navy to blockade the port of Athens and force the Greek government to repay Pacifico.

After the House of Lords moved to censure Palmerston for his rash use of military force, he delivered a powerful five-hour address defending his decisive action. “As the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say Civis Romanus sum; so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England, will protect him against injustice and wrong.”

Barack Obama could learn a thing or two from Lord Palmerston when it comes to protecting American citizens abroad. Palmerston certainly would not have allowed two of his country’s journalists to sit in a North Korean prison after a sham conviction on trumped-up charges. What is the Obama foreign policy team going to do about it?

We know how that story ended. In August, Bill Clinton, with the apparent blessing of the Obama Administration, was able to secure the release of Euna Lee and Laura Ling (who are Korean- and Chinese-American respectively. Their employer, Al Gore, thanked the State Department for its help:

"It speaks well of our country that when two American citizens are in harm's way, that so many people will just put things aside and just go to work to make sure that this has had a happy ending," he said.

Indeed. Stories like these of America rescuing its citizens from far-flung lands abound, filling us with pride that our citizenship means something. This is so important that one U.S. Army unit, the 82nd Airborne Division, regularly trains with this mission in mind. The U.S. Marines and Navy are also prepared for such an eventuality. Go to any U.S. Embassy website and you will find a plan for emergency evacuations.

Civis Americanus sum. I am an American citizen. This is not merely a descriptive statement, but an assertive one, claiming all the rights and duties imbued in that citizenship, an idea the Romans held in highest esteem. Two thousand years ago, when the apostle Paul was capriciously flogged and imprisoned at Philippi (in Greece) for preaching his new-fangled faith, he famously asserted his Roman citizenship, and his captors were "terrified" and let him go (Acts 16:35-40). Later, he was arrested in Jerusalem for "causing a stir" and held in Caesarea Maritima for two years without a trial until the new governor heard his case; Paul again asserted his Roman citizenship and appealed to Caesar for a trial under Roman law. That the trial ended badly for Paul should not obscure the fact that his assertion of civis Romanus sum was heard and upheld. Whether he was Jewish or, worse, Christian did not deprive him of his right to due process as a Roman citizen.

Caesarea Maritima is located on the Mediterranean coast of modern-day Israel, 40 km from Tel Aviv. The ruins are stunning; one can see Herod's palace, a hippodrome (stadium), and a restored amphitheater against a backdrop of the gorgeous blue-green Mediterranean waters. When I visited it a month ago, I was struck by the fact that if Paul were alive today and, say, an American citizen, he would assert civis Americanus sum! and get our government to pressure Israel on his behalf. And I would expect our government to do no less. But, if Paul were an Arab American, he would be sorely disappointed in our government's response.

I knew before I went there that Israel treats Palestinian Arabs differently than Jewish Israelis and foreign citizens. Unlike the latter groups, Palestinian Arabs are not allowed to travel outside the West Bank or Gaza. A lucky few can get permits to work in Israel, but these are limited in scope, must be renewed every four months, and can be revoked at any time. But then I learned that Israel also treats foreign citizens differently depending on their ethnic heritage. I heard stories about Arab Americans being subjected to the same restrictions as Palestinians, while non-Arab Americans can travel freely in Israel. At first, I naively refused to believe that our government would permit such discriminatory treatment of American citizens abroad. Then I saw this on the U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem's website:

Palestinian-Americans Must Enter Through Allenby. For some time, the government of Israel has not permitted Americans with Palestinian nationality (or even, in some cases, the claim to it) to enter Israel via Ben Gurion Airport. Many are sent back to the U.S. upon arrival, though some are permitted in, but told they cannot depart Israel via Ben Gurion without special permission (which is rarely granted). Families have had to travel separately back to the United States in some cases, and some travelers have had to forfeit expensive airline tickets. Please check with the government of Israel -- via their Embassy in Washington -- before you travel that you will be able to enter and depart through Ben Gurion.

Haaretz also reported last month that a Palestinian Canadian businessman was denied entry into Israel because of his heritage.

It's one thing for Israel to have such policies. That debate is outside the scope of this post. It's another thing for America to stand quietly by while some of her citizens face such treatment, based on nothing other than their ethnic heritage. I was heartened to see the State Department issue a press release last month taking Israel to task for this discrimination:

We have repeatedly told the Government of Israel that the United States expects that all American citizens to be treated equally, regardless of their national origin or other citizenship. We have let the Government of Israel know that these restrictions unfairly impact Palestinian and Arab American travelers and are not acceptable.

That's good, but not good enough. Condoleeza Rice also "told them" the same thing back in 2006. Last I checked, we still provide $3 billion in foreign aid to Israel (pdf link), funded in part by tax paying Arab Americans.

Civis Americanus sum means less than we think.

The Madness of King Huck - Part II

In my last post, I slammed Mike Huckabee for saying America shouldn't tell Israelis where they can live. I mistakenly assumed he hadn't thought through what this would mean for the prospects of a free Palestinian homeland. I was wrong. Huckabee went off the deep end. In the same trip he also said this:

Former U.S. presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee said Tuesday while on a visit to Israel that establishing a Palestinian state in "the middle of the Jewish homeland" would be "unrealistic."

WTF?

What precisely does he want to do with the Palestinians already living there? Make them Israeli citizens? (FYI, they're not citizens. They're not citizens of any country.) Israel will never give citizenship to Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza because then Arabs would go from being 20% of the population to well in the majority. How do you like that?

Or, perhaps Huck thinks Israel should kick them all out. That would be the definition of ethnic cleansing.

If you have some time, please read around Haaretz and you'll see a vibrant debate and more balanced views within Israel. Huck has now planted himself in the far right of Israel! Is it sad that he's not seen as an extremist here in the U.S.?

One editorial note: in case you're wondering about my sudden focus on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, I just returned from a two week trip stay in Jerusalem. It was an eye-opening trip, mainly because I saw and heard a much larger variety of views among Israeli Jews than among Americans back home. Especially, among the evangelican Christian folks who, like Huckabee, have based their foreign policy on the Old Testament. If you think that Bible-talk about God giving Palestine to the Jews is archaic stuff, think again. It is current foreign policy for much of America. I wonder what they and Huck think of the fact that Palestinian Arabs also include lots of Christians. Do they even know? Did the Huckster go to a local Arab Christian service while he was there? I suggest he go to one the next time he's there and tell them what he thinks of their plight.

The Madness of King Huck

From The Atlantic:

Mike Huckabee is in east Jerusalem today, and he had some critical things to say about President Obama's posture toward Israel. The U.S. should not "be telling Jewish people in Israel where they should and should not live," Huckabee said according to The Jerusalem Post; his traveling partner, a New York state assemblyman, called U.S. Israel policy a "horror."

Sigh.

The key (unstated) point, of course, is that Israeli settlements are popping up in occupied lands. Now, if you want to argue that you don't consider the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem to be occupied lands, you'd be consistent. Loony, but consistent. To cloak that explosive viewpoint in language about not meddling in another country's affairs is bullshit.

That said, if Israel were to invade the Sinai peninsula tomorrow and start settling it, would we condone that? Israel did that starting in 1967 and only a peace settlement with Egypt led them to withdraw in 1979. What if Israel were to re-invade Lebanon and settle there? Jordan? Egypt itself? Any of these scenarios (well, ok, maybe not Egypt) are plausible, all in the name of security. Where might King Huck draw the line at interfering?

Lastly...the truly grotesque problem with the occupation is that Israel is now in the immoral position of having different legal regimes for Jews and Arabs. If things continue in this vein, Israel will have no choice but to either expel all non-Jews or give full citizenship to them, thus irrevocably discarding the "Jewish" character of the country.

This is why this is a struggle for Israel's soul.

[edit] Yes, I realize Sinai is part of Egypt. Substitute some other country name and my point remains, unsullied by your taunts.

America's "solidarity" with Israel

Israel has been roundly condemned for recently evicting nine Palestinian families in East Jerusalem in order to let in Jewish settlers into an historically Arab neighborhood. The most important thing to note from this Israeli decision is not that Israel is exercising its (illegal) claim of sovereignty in Jerusalem by enforcing Israeli laws there, but that this is stark proof that Israel's laws are racist, with separate legal systems for Jews and Arabs. Not my words, but those of an Israeli Jew commenting in Haaretz:

Somewhere, perhaps in a refugee camp in terrible poverty, lives the family of the farmer who plowed the land where my house now stands. According to the Israeli judicial system, they have the right to get their land back immediately, destroy my house, return and grow Jaffa oranges for export on its ruins, and remove me by force if necessary. The Jerusalem District Court, which recently ruled that representatives of the Sephardi community committee had the right to take back the Hanun and Gawi families' apartments in East Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood, has opened the 1948 file. That is, if Israel had an egalitarian system of law and justice, if the legal system were fair, because then millions of Palestinians would be able to applaud the court and demonstrate their joy in the streets at the ruling.

Of course, that is not how this issue as a whole is seen in some parts of America:

A U.S. delegation of Republican congressmen visiting Israel on Thursday said that the Obama administration's policy on Israel is misguided, puts too much emphasis on the issue of settlements and ignores the bigger threat of a nuclear-armed Iran.

And, the best part of all:

Cantor and others supported Israel's handling of the eviction of two Arab
families from a house in east Jerusalem earlier this week, a move criticized by the European Union and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

"I don't think we, in America, would want another country telling us how to implement and execute our laws," Cantor said.

My question: does the American public even know what Israeli laws and policies we're supporting?

That commenter, Gideon Levy, has been dismissed as a self-hating Jew. Perhaps we ought to consider for a moment whether he is actually right. If he is, how do we justify solidarity with such policies?